RUSSIAN
FEDERATION
Russian
Economic Review, January of 2011
Key economic
indicators
(as of corresponding period of previous year)
2011
Jan.
Feb.
1.
|
Output
index for the key economic activities*
|
105.1
|
|
2.
|
Industrial
output index
|
106.7
|
|
3.
|
Transport
freight turnover
|
104.9
|
|
4.
|
Fixed
capital investment
|
95.3
|
|
5.
|
Retail
trade turnover
|
100.5
|
|
6.
|
Consumer
price index
|
109.6
|
109.5
|
|
as
% of December of previous year
|
102.4
|
103.2
|
7.
|
Core
inflation, as % of December of previous year
|
101.1
|
101.8
|
9.
|
Real
disposable money income
|
94.5
|
|
10.
|
Spending
on goods and services**
|
103.0
|
|
11.
|
Commodity
exports***
|
|
|
|
Billions
of US dollars
|
33.3
|
|
|
as
% of corresponding period of previous year
|
120.3
|
|
12.
|
Commodity
imports***
|
|
|
13.
|
Billions
of US dollars
|
16.00
|
|
|
as
% of corresponding period of previous year
|
141.0
|
|
14.
|
Official
Ruble/US dollar exchange rate at the end of period, rubles per dollar
|
29.67
|
28.94
|
15.
|
Amount
of overdue accounts receivable of companies and organizations (billions
RUR)****
|
1061,2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Calculated
on the basis of data on changes in output volumes in agriculture,
mining, manufacturing, the production and distribution of electricity,
gas and water, construction, transport, retail and wholesale trade.
**
Estimate.
*** Based
on the balance of payments methodology (as of March 11, 2011).
****
- Preliminary data.
|
|
|
|
Source:
the Federal State Statistics Service, the Bank of Russia.
|
|
|
Macroeconomics
and Finance: on the oil wings
In January, oil prices again rose for the
first time since the crisis and have exceeded USD 100 per
barrel (for the last time oil prices were at
that level in February 2008). Therefore, the rise in prices
is continued for six consecutive months and
reached about 30% growth as compared with summer
prices. This circumstance affected the main
trends of macroeconomic dynamics in late 2010 and
early 2011: improvement of the trade balance,
stabilization of the dynamics of foreign currency and
gold reserves and RUR strengthening.
After the failure in
August, the trade
surplus at the end of the year consistently exceeded the
indicator of 10 billion dollars. After
stagnating in November, in December the growth in imports,
according to the FCS tentative assessments
(for foreign countries), was accelerated again to 11%
as compared with the previous month. However,
rising oil prices compensate for this acceleration.
Reserves of the Central Bank in January, for
the first time since the second half of October 2010,
have ceased to decline. On January 21 they
amounted to 482 billion against 476 billion on December
24. We would like to remind, that from the third
week of October until December 24 the reserves have
decreased by 27.6 billion (5.5%). Throughout
this period, an intense outflow of capital was recorded
in Russia, which exceeded 38 billion dollars
for the year. Moreover, three quarters of this outflow
occurred in September - December 2010.
In December 2010 the RUR
real effective
exchange rate rose by 3.7%. As a result of 2010, the
ruble strengthening in real terms in the
two-currency basket has reached 7.1%, as compared with
the weakening in 2009 to 3.9%. In January,
this trend was continued. The value of the two-currency
basket in January continued to decrease: on
January 25, it amounted to 34.67 rubles. (-0.7% as
compared with the end of December).
As expected, the trend
towards higher inflation
acceleration has spilled over to the new year.
However, the rate of inflation in January -
102.4% - was higher than even the pessimistic forecasts
of Ministry of Economic Development
(2,1-2,3%). The largest contribution to the rise in prices was
made by seasonal factors - increases in
tariffs for water supply and heating, common to the beginning
of the year, and the rising prices for fruit
and vegetables. Contribution to the jump in prices has
been also made by increased excise taxes for
gasoline from January 1, 2011. As a result, the official
forecast of annual inflation (at 7.6%) in
2011 ceased to play any role. Inflation risks will remain
high during the first half of 2011.
Against this background,
the Bank of Russia
has still left at the same level the interest rates on
operations to provide liquidity, but
increased the deposit rates and reserve requirements. However,
such tightening of monetary policy is not
enough to slow down inflation, which, according to our
estimates, in 2011 may well be higher than in
2010, while the Bank of Russia opts for the purposes
of stimulating the economy, but if prices
growth in February remain high enough, it will have to
adjust its policy.
In December, the excessive
reserves of
commercial banks increased significantly: as per the month
result, they have reached RUR 2.2168 bn,
which is 1.4 times more than in November. The growth
of reserves was caused primarily by more than
fourfold increase in bank deposits with the Bank of
Russia, as well as more than 1.5 -fold growth
of banks’ correspondent accounts with the Central Bank.
Such dynamics is explained by a seasonal
increase in budgetary expenditure at the end of the year.
Real
Sector
On January 31, Rosstat has disclosed the
estimates as of GDP growth rate in 2010, which
amounted to 4%. Such assessment indicates a
significant acceleration of economic growth in late
2010. Basing on previous quarterly growth (I
quarter – 3.1% versus the same period of 2009, in II
quarter – 5.2%, in III quarter – 2.7%), the
growth in the IV quarter should reach at least 5% of the
IV quarter of previous year. Moreover, the
economy should grow relative to the previous quarter at a
rate significantly higher than the rate
typical for the whole recovery period (from III quarter 2009).
It looks amazing when you consider that,
according to Federal State Statistics Service, the pace
of growth in major industries in the IV
quarter were significantly lower than in the most successful
quarter II. Thus, the volume of industrial production
increased in the IV quarter by 6.5%, against
10.9% in the II quarter, production grew by
2% in the IV quarter against 4.8% in the II quarter,
manufacturing activity -
by 9.9% versus 16.3%, transport freight
turnover - by 2.4% against 13%.
Trade turnover has also showed a slowdown in
the IV quarter (4.1% versus 5.3% in the II quarter
and 5.9% in the quarter III ). Among the
clearly positive trends of the year end, it should be noted a
significant acceleration in investment growth
in fixed assets (up to 12.8% in the IV quarter against
7.2% in the previous quarter and negative
growth in the early years), as well as increase the amount
of work in the construction of 5 6%. Thus, we
can say that construction is the last area in which the
economy has recovered from recession and
demonstrates the positive (and accelerating) growth for
two consecutive quarters. However, investment
and construction are usually delayed in its dynamics
in relation to other areas of the economy.
Another
disturbing trend in 2010 was the
actual restoration of import share in cash resources of
retail trade. In 2007-2008 the proportion was
47% in 2009, at the background of the crisis, fell to
the level of 39-41%, but in the III quarter
of 2010 reached the pre-crisis value. This indicates that
the
recovery
resource in domestic
demand that could have a significant impact on the growth of
domestic production, is close to exhaustion.
The Rosstat index of
business confidence
demonstrated in January 2011 a positive trend, which,
however, was regarded by the Rosstat
as seasonal factor (normal for
January increased optimism
of manufacturers). Business surveys of the
Gaidar Institute demonstrated a sustained situation
typical of recent months: the relative
satisfaction with the present situation and the considerable
uncertainty in the future. Purified from
seasonal demand growth in December, showed growth, with
the satisfaction of demand remained the same.
Purified from seasonal factors, the dynamics of the
actual demonstrate the output index for the
next crisis peak. Against this background, the companies
refuse from the plans to reduce staff.
However, a more subtle indicator of the forecast shows the
continued pessimism in the evaluation of the
future. The negative balance of answers regarding the
stock of finished products shows that the
company definitely does not want to replenish their stocks
of finished products per new customer and
prefer to have it made production much less than usual
for the month volume.
The surveys demonstrate
that companies
transferred to the tactics of raising product prices in the
last months of the last year, do not intend
to abandon it. The industry is planning significant price
growth during the first months of the new
year, probably even to the detriment of sales. But it seems,
that increasing tax burden does not leave any
other choice to the companies. Such a drastic revision
of the price plans were not in the Russian
industry since September 1998.
Source: Gaidar
Institute for the Economic Policy
|